Cominus.com :: Union Legislative Council V State

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

Union Legislative Council v State :: 145 Wn2d 544

Category: Initiative and Elections

The Supreme Court struck down Initiative 695 because they had interpreted it as addressing more than one issue. The initiative sought to repeal the annual 2.2% Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) which on a $10,000 car was $220 a year - sort of like a 13th car payment every year - by limiting it to $30. The $30 tab fee was considered to be the more important portion of I-695, which had also sought to require voter approval for future tax increases. The legislature responded to the overturning of I-695 by passing its own bill, SB6865, with the single purpose of limiting the MVET to a flat $30 fee.

In this case local taxing authorities sued the State because they believed the State still had the duty to collect the local portion of the old MVET tax which far exceeded the new $30 tab fee.

By finding for the local taxing authorities the Court demonstrated that special interests can prevail over the will of the people who are using the initiative process. It was clear that the people by initiative, and the legislature by passing SB 6865, intended a $30 flat fee for car tabs.

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passAlexander, Gerry  
passAnderson, Jerald R 
passGoltz, Jeffrey  
passGregoire, Christine  
passJohnson, Charles  
passMadsen, Barbara  
passSanders, Richard  
failAlvarez, David  
failBanks, Gregory  
failBaur, Susan I 
failBridge, Bobbe  
failBurleson, Gary  
failCampbell, Darin  
failChambers, Tom  
failClem, Steven  
failClift, Michael  
failCurtis, Arthur  
failDalzell, Juelie  
failEmacio, James  
failHallstrom, Stephen  
failHardung, Jessica  
failHauge, Russell D 
failHolm, Edward G 
failHorne, Gerald A 
failIreland, Faith  
failJamieson Jr, David  
failJoly, Janine E 
failKaufman, James  
failKlumpp, David  
failKnodell, John  
failKrider, James  
failLangabeer, Richard  
failLee, Mark  
failLowe, Steven M 
failMaleng, Norman  
failMarshall, Ronald  
failMcEachran, David  
failMelly, Christopher  
failMenefee, H Steward 
failMiener, Roger  
failMiles, Alan L 
failMiller, Andrew K 
failNagle, James L 
failNoble, Cassandra  
failOwens, Susan  
failRandolph, Jeremy  
failRiesen, Gary  
failShea, Christopher  
failShirley, Ronald  
failSivley, Gordon  
failSmith, Charles  
failSmith, Michael D 
failSullivan, Jeffrey  
failTabor, Gary  
failThomas, Hilary  
failTucker, Steven  
failVerge, Thomas  
failWatts, Randall  
failWieland, Jennifer  
failWyrick, Curtis  
failZirkle, Ronald  

«« Back To Case Reviews


1CO 2:16 [NIV] :: “For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct Him?” But we have the mind of Christ.

SITE MENU
HOME

God's Call

Tandem Vincitur Firmly Established Isaiah's Warning Salvation - Who? Salvation - How? Prayers

Cominus' Agenda

Cominus Papers Under Tower Babel Blog Dean's Recipes Work For FOO

Judicial Forum

Judicial Reviews Judicial Ratings Judicial Elections Judicial Questions Justice Goodloe

Site Docket

Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms Of Use

Our Products:
Content Management
Domains For Lease
Diesel Database
For Sale File
Fun Feed
Bargain Patrol
Google Zoogle

Our Clients:
Extreme Coatings
KMSGC Pr Wash
Jack Case Cowboy
Idaho Truck Repair
Import Profile
Const'l Income
Truth In Taxation

Our Businesses:
Cougar Gulch Group
Unique Motif
Buy Cadillac
Idaho Contractor