Cominus.com :: State V Ljm

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

State V LJM :: 129 Wn2d 386

Category: Tribal Issues

The State appealed the Appellate Court’s dismissal of defendant for lack of jurisdiction. The principle question before the Supreme Court was whether, in a case where the location of the crime is within the boundaries of an Indian reservation and the defendant identifies himself as a tribal member, the State’s burden of proof is greater than it would otherwise be on the issue of jurisdiction and whether that proof was satisfied. [at 387-88].

The Court of Appeals rejected the State’s jurisdiction based on its dissatisfaction that the title to the property on which the crimes occurred was adequately verified to be held in fee. [at 391]. The State argued that the State had jurisdiction because the crime had been committed in the State and that the State had submitted proof. [at 392, cite omitted].].

The defendant tried to cloud the issue by bringing up Indian lineage but was unable to produce evidence of tribal jurisdiction based on Indian status nor based on property title. [at 395-96]. The Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (WAPA) “argued that in order to elevate the State’s burden of proof with respect to jurisdiction, a defendant must come forward with more than an assertion that he or she is a tribal member.” [at 393].

The Supreme Court, in unison, upheld the trial court’s decision as well as the State’s argument that the State had met the burden of proof of jurisdiction because the crime had been committed within the State boundaries.

The State has the responsibility to prosecute for all crimes against persons except for a very narrow window that the federal government has usurped with regard to Indians. This decision does not, however, resolve the dual citizenship of reservation Indians, but it does clarify some issues that have heretofore been clouded.

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passAlexander, Gerry  
passBurchard Jr, John  
passDolliver, James  
passDurham, Barbara  
passGuy, Richard  
passHauge, Russell D 
passJohnson, Charles  
passLoginsky, Pamela  
passMadsen, Barbara  
passSanders, Richard  
passSmith, Charles  
passTalmadge, Phil  
passWeber, Richard  
failAgid, Susan  
failMunson, Ray  
failSchultheis, John  
failThompson, Philip  
failWeaver Jr, Thomas  

«« Back To Case Reviews


JER 7:9-10 [NIV] :: Will you steal and murder, commit adultery and perjury, burn incense to Baal and follow other gods you have not known, and then come and stand before me in this house, which bears My Name, and say, “We are safe” safe to do all these detestable things?

SITE MENU
HOME

God's Call

Tandem Vincitur Firmly Established Isaiah's Warning Salvation - Who? Salvation - How? Prayers

Cominus' Agenda

Cominus Papers Under Tower Babel Blog Dean's Recipes Work For FOO

Judicial Forum

Judicial Reviews Judicial Ratings Judicial Elections Judicial Questions Justice Goodloe

Site Docket

Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms Of Use

Husky Floor Liners

Our Products:
Content Management
Domains For Lease
Diesel Database
For Sale File
Fun Feed
Bargain Patrol
Google Zoogle

Our Clients:
Extreme Coatings
KMSGC Pr Wash
Jack Case Cowboy
Idaho Truck Repair
Import Profile
Const'l Income
Truth In Taxation

Our Businesses:
Cougar Gulch Group
Unique Motif
Buy Cadillac
Idaho Contractor