Cominus.com :: State V Kleist

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

State v Kleist :: 126 Wn2d 432

Category: Sentencing Guidelines

There are some cases that should not be tried because they do not effect justice and they waste the taxpayers’ money. This appeal is a clear example of just such a case. Sandra Sue Kleist had stolen almost $300.00 worth of clothing from the Bon. However, Nordstroms had the same articles on sale for less than $250.00. She wanted her conviction reduced from second degree theft to third degree, conforming to the lesser sales price.

Why is the Supreme Court even hearing this case? Both lower courts ruled that there was ample foundation to hold that the retail price tag was enough to confirm the market value of the goods stolen. If nothing else, as Justice Guy pointed out in his dissent, a reasonable person would be put on notice by the price tag. [at 441].

The Court acknowledged two definitions for “value.” The first definition is found in RCW 9A.56.010(12)(a):

“Value” means the market value of the property or services at the time and in the approximate area of the criminal act. [at 434].

The second definition was developed from case law, State v Clark 13 WnApp 782, 787:

“Market value” is defined in this state as the price which a well-informed buyer would pay to a well-informed seller, where neither is obliged to enter into the transaction. [Emphasis added]. [at 435].

It is clear that Sandra Kleist coerced the Bon into this transaction and should not receive the benefit of comparison shopping at locations other than that proximate area. A comparison of prices may be legitimate if it is known that the victim was notorious for arbitrary pricing. The Bon, however, has a track record of a professional and consistent pricing structure. As Justice Guy pointed out in dissent, “The Bon Marché is a well-informed seller with many well-informed buyers.” [at 442].

If she wanted a lesser conviction, she should have stolen the clothes from Nordstroms. Is that too hard for a judge to understand?

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passDurham, Barbara  
passGuy, Richard  
passKorsmo, Kevin  
passMetts, Andrew  
passMunson, Ray  
passO'Connor, Kathleen  
passSmith, Charles  
passSweeney, Dennis  
passSweetser, James  
passTalmadge, Phil  
passThompson, Philip  
failAlexander, Gerry  
failBarlow, James  
failDolliver, James  
failJohnson, Charles  
failMadsen, Barbara  
failUtter, Robert  

«« Back To Case Reviews


ISA 43:10-11 [NIV] :: “You are My witnesses,” declares the LORD, “and My servant whom I have chosen, so that you may know and believe Me and understand that I am He. Before Me no god was formed, nor will there be one after Me. I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from Me there is no savior.

SITE MENU
HOME

God's Call

Tandem Vincitur Firmly Established Isaiah's Warning Salvation - Who? Salvation - How? Prayers

Cominus' Agenda

Cominus Papers Under Tower Babel Blog Dean's Recipes Work For FOO

Judicial Forum

Judicial Reviews Judicial Ratings Judicial Elections Judicial Questions Justice Goodloe

Site Docket

Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms Of Use

Husky Floor Liners

Our Products:
Content Management
Domains For Lease
Diesel Database
For Sale File
Fun Feed
Bargain Patrol
Google Zoogle

Our Clients:
Extreme Coatings
KMSGC Pr Wash
Jack Case Cowboy
Idaho Truck Repair
Import Profile
Const'l Income
Truth In Taxation

Our Businesses:
Cougar Gulch Group
Unique Motif
Buy Cadillac
Idaho Contractor