Cominus.com :: State V Dennis Wadsworth

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

State v Dennis Wadsworth :: 139 Wn2d 724

Category: Separation of Powers

The State of Washington appealed the District Court dismissal of the charge against Dennis Wadsworth. Wadsworth was prosecuted for unlawful possession of a weapon in a prohibited area. Namely, he refused to relinquish his Swiss Army knife in the lobby of a courthouse.

The Supreme Court majority found him guilty after the District Court dismissed the case. The District Court determined that the statute was unconstitutional because the Legislature granted to the “local judicial authorities” (rather than the local legislative authorities) the power to determine where the possession of a weapon is unlawful within the court buildings. The majority disagreed.

The dissenting justices pointed out “that our [C]onstitution does not permit the Legislature to delegate to the judiciary the task of defining, in whole or in part, what conduct constitutes criminal activity.” [at 744]. Furthermore, they stressed “that the Legislature, not the judiciary . . . is responsible for defining the elements of a crime.” [at 744]. “The vice of the statute under review here is that the distinction between the role of the Legislature and that of the judiciary is blurred because the statute delegates to the local judicial authority the task of designating areas, not otherwise specified in the statute, where weapons are prohibited. [at 750].

The role of the court is to decide the guilt or innocence of those charged and, if guilty, to appropriately sentence. When the court makes the rules regarding what elements constitute a crime, they have become lawmaker as well. The court now has a conflict of interest regarding the law, separation of powers is violated and our republic is in danger.

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passAlexander, Gerry  
passBrandes, Ramona  
passRiehl, James  
passSanders, Richard  
failGuy, Richard  
failHauge, Russell D 
failIreland, Faith  
failJahns, Jeffrey  
failJohnson, Charles  
failLoginsky, Pamela  
failMadsen, Barbara  
failSmith, Charles  
failSweeney, Dennis  
failTalmadge, Phil  

«« Back To Case Reviews


HEB 9:22 [NIV] :: In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.

SITE MENU
HOME

God's Call

Tandem Vincitur Firmly Established Isaiah's Warning Salvation - Who? Salvation - How? Prayers

Cominus' Agenda

Cominus Papers Under Tower Babel Blog Dean's Recipes Work For FOO

Judicial Forum

Judicial Reviews Judicial Ratings Judicial Elections Judicial Questions Justice Goodloe

Site Docket

Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms Of Use

Our Products:
Content Management
Domains For Lease
Diesel Database
For Sale File
Fun Feed
Bargain Patrol
Google Zoogle

Our Clients:
Extreme Coatings
KMSGC Pr Wash
Jack Case Cowboy
Idaho Truck Repair
Import Profile
Const'l Income
Truth In Taxation

Our Businesses:
Cougar Gulch Group
Unique Motif
Buy Cadillac
Idaho Contractor