Cominus.com :: Rhodazalea V Snohomish County

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

RhodAZalea v Snohomish County :: 136 Wn2d 1

Category: Land Use and Property Rights

This company has been in the peat mining business before 1961. Since that time, however, Snohomish County has adopted zoning ordinances and other regulations and standards. Rhod-A-Zalea is a legitimate “nonconforming use” because they existed prior to the regulations.

Due to a complaint from a neighbor, the County Hearing Examiner decided that, although it was established as a nonconforming use, the operation was subject to provisions of the county’s building code requiring it to get a grading permit. The Superior Court judge rejected that argument, “ruling that the plaintiff’s vested right to continue its peat mining operations as a nonconforming use included the right to grade, excavate and fill the property.” [at 2]. The Appeals Court upheld this judgment.

The Supreme Court reversed the two lower courts on the basis that the County has a legitimate right to exercise police powers for the regulation of health and safety issues. Because the nature of their mining operation is excavating, grading and filling, to subject this company to grading permits will, in fact, grant the County complete authority over every aspect of this operation. What the County cannot accomplish through zoning, they will accomplish through permits. We reject this notion.

Justice Sanders also disagrees and further points out that the Uniform Building Code, which the County claims as their authority, specifically exempts mining operations. Furthermore, precedent directs the court to recognize that “a valid nonconforming use carries with it the right to the exercise of those accessory uses which are considered customary and incidental to the principle use.” [at 22, cites omitted].

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passBoger, Brent  
passCattle, Bradford  
passDolliver, James  
passGroen, John M 
passGrosse, C Kenneth 
passKennedy, Faye  
passRivett, Robin  
passSanders, Richard  
passWebster, Walter  
passWynne, Thomas  
failAlexander, Gerry  
failDurham, Barbara  
failGuy, Richard  
failJohnson, Charles  
failKrider, James  
failMadsen, Barbara  
failMaleng, Norman  
failNewell, Cassandra  
failSmith, Charles  
failTalmadge, Phil  
failWeibel, Carol  

«« Back To Case Reviews


ECC 12:1 [NIV] :: Remember your Creator in the days of your youth, before the days of trouble come and the years approach when you will say, “I find no pleasure in them”.

SITE MENU
HOME

God's Call

Tandem Vincitur Firmly Established Isaiah's Warning Salvation - Who? Salvation - How? Prayers

Cominus' Agenda

Cominus Papers Under Tower Babel Blog Dean's Recipes Work For FOO

Judicial Forum

Judicial Reviews Judicial Ratings Judicial Elections Judicial Questions Justice Goodloe

Site Docket

Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms Of Use

Our Products:
Content Management
Domains For Lease
Diesel Database
For Sale File
Fun Feed
Bargain Patrol
Google Zoogle

Our Clients:
Extreme Coatings
KMSGC Pr Wash
Jack Case Cowboy
Idaho Truck Repair
Import Profile
Const'l Income
Truth In Taxation

Our Businesses:
Cougar Gulch Group
Unique Motif
Buy Cadillac
Idaho Contractor