Cominus.com :: Harland Maylon V Pierce County

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

Harland Maylon v Pierce County :: 131 Wn2d 779

Category: First Amendment

This case is about the constitutionality of religious freedom. It involved the use of volunteer chaplains by the Pierce County Sheriff department. This practice has been authorized by statute by the Legislature. It was undisputed that no public funds were expended to pay these volunteers, although public money was used to alleviate some overhead expenses. The public funds were in the form of office space, insurance, police jackets, radios and such items necessary to carry out the work. The actual funding of the chaplains’ work and adjunct costs was by private parties, churches and business.

The work of the chaplains, according to contract and practice was largely secular. The problem Mr. Malyon had with the program is that there were instances of consensual religious practice, as when a chaplain would offer a prayer or make reference to God. The trial judge disagreed that this practice violated any First Amendment protections. The Appellate Court, however, reversed him. So the case traveled to the Supreme Court.

Justice Sanders begins the examination of the constitutional issue with an examination of the constitutional text. “Appropriate constitutional analysis begins with the text and, for most purposes should end there as well.” [at 799]. The majority found that, while there are distinct differences between the federal and State constitutions, “we note religious freedom is the overall objective of each.” [at 790]. “It was never the intention that our [C]onstitution should be construed in any manner indicating hostility toward any religion. . . . Our responsibility is not to purge religion from society; it is to protect each citizen’s right to religious liberty.” [at 785].

Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty; sometimes it pays to work to get good judges elected to office.

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passAlexander, Gerry  
passDurham, Barbara  
passGuy, Richard  
passHamilton, Daniel R 
passJohnson, Charles  
passLandenburg, John  
passSanders, Richard  
passThompson, Donald H 
failAlbertson, Dan M 
failDolliver, James  
failMadsen, Barbara  
failSeinfeld, Karen  
failSmith, Charles  
failWiggins, Charles K 

«« Back To Case Reviews


PRO 19:17 [NIV] :: He who is kind to the poor lends to the LORD, and He will reward him for what he has done.

Husky Floor Liners