Cominus.com :: Griffin V West Rs Inc, Et Al

In the past, God overlooked mans' ignorance, but now He commands all
people everywhere to repent. For He has set a day when He will judge
the world with justice by the Man, Jesus Christ; the One He has appointed.
He has given proof of this to all men by raising Him from the dead.
                                                                                        -Acts 17:30-31

Griffin v West RS Inc, et al :: 143 Wn2d 81

Category: Landlord Tenant Relations

Tenant Griffin lived alone in a large complex. One day she heard a loud noise while she was in the shower. When she found debris on the floor under the attic crawl access she contacted the manager. Two maintenance personnel conducted an inspection, told the tenant they found nothing suspicious and placed a two-by-four across the access.

Two weeks later, her neighbor came through the access and attacked her as she left the shower. She was hit with a pan and he broke her wrist as she fled naked. The attacker pursued but was subdued by neighbors and held for the police. Griffin sued her landlord for violating its alleged duty to protect her from harm. [At 84].

The Court upheld the jury decision that the landlord had been negligent but was not the proximate cause of the attack. They awarded no damages against the landlord. The majority agreed with the landlord’s contention that they do not have an absolute duty to protect their tenants against every foreseeable criminal act.

Talmadge disagreed and argued that landlords have a responsibility “to protect their tenants from foreseeable criminal conduct arising out of the use of spaces under the control of the landlord.” [At 96]. I would like to argue with Talmadge: How far does the landlord go to uphold that duty? The criminal already demonstrated his intent to reach the victim by breaking through the sheetrock barrier in the attic. He could do the same with the party wall between the two units. What about common areas? Should all trees and bushes be removed and guards posted around the site to stave off would be attackers? Does the landlord owe the tenant a greater protection than the tenant would have if he owned his own home? For trial lawyers that answer can never be reached.

Rating the Usual Suspects:
passAlexander, Gerry  
passBridge, Bobbe  
passBuri, Philip  
passGuy, Richard  
passMadsen, Barbara  
passSanders, Richard  
passSmith, Charles  
passWesley, Joseph R 
failCox, Ronald  
failIreland, Faith  
failJohnson, Charles  
failNorthcraft, Mark  
failTalmadge, Phil  
failWoods, Dennis  

«« Back To Case Reviews


PRO 29:25-26 [NIV] :: Fear of man will prove to be a snare, but whoever trusts in the LORD is kept safe. Many seek an audience with a ruler, but it is from the LORD that man gets justice.

Husky Floor Liners